because of

Compensation for damages arising from the Allies' official order against the German Reich and violation of the general rules of international law, defined here in the Convention with respect to the laws and customs of war on land, with annex of regulations of 1907 (HLWC), which applies to all parties until the end of the World War.

These states are responsible for ensuring that the HLWC, Section Three - Occupation, is observed with regard to the Danzigers.

With the invasion of Danzig on September 1, 1939 at 4:45 a.m., the nationals of the nationalist German Reich were responsible for the violations of the HLWC.

Now it is again the nationals of the nationalist German Reich and subsequently the Swiss Confederation, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Kingdom of Belgium and Austria.

The alleged instigator is the founder and head of the Swiss foundation World Economic Forum (WEF) and founder of the Swiss foundation "Young Global Leaders", Mr. Klaus Schwab, a national of the nationalist German Reich. He himself publicly admits that the "Young Global Leaders" penetrate governments. This means that the governments are not forced to represent the interests of their state, their people, but the interests of the "Young Global Leaders".

A criminal complaint and criminal charges are brought on suspicion of criminal acts under Indictment Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of the Statutes of the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials....for more please read:

This is how the publicity of a trial is practiced and not like in the FRG, where minutes do not contain witness statements or access to files is denied.

On the website of the US State Department there is a pdf with a list of the bilateral and multilateral treaties of the USA that are in force.

We are publishing the link and the pdf here so that everyone can see for themselves that, for example, the Potsdam Agreement is still in force (see page 549 - Protocol of the proceedings of the Berlin conference) and not, as claimed on the German page of wikipedia, that it is no longer in force.

This is important because it is repeatedly claimed that Germany or the FRG is sovereign.

Even J.D. Vance, Donald Trump's candidate for Vice President in the upcoming election, refers to Germany as a “client” of the USA.

Plaintiff filed this civil action pro se on July 25, 2024, and the Clerk of Court issued summonses to Plaintiff on September 23, 2024. Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis and therefore is responsible for serving the Defendants with process, consisting of the summons and a copy of the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (c). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4: "If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court - on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice...or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (m). Here, more than 90 days have elapsed since Plaintiff filed his Complaint, yet the record does not reflect that service has occurred. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to show cause in writing by May 19, 2025 why this action should not be dismissed. If Plaintiff does not effectuate service or satisfactorily respond to this Minute Order by May 19, 2025, the Court may dismiss this case without further notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (m); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Civil Rule 83.23. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail this Minute Order to Plaintiff's address of record. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 4/18/25. (lccjn1)

Consistent with Local Civil Rule 7(i), paragraph 5 of the Court's Standing Order, ECF No. 4, requires proposed amended pleadings to "be accompanied by a redline comparison of the original and amended pleading." Because Plaintiff's6 Motion to Amend Complaint does not include such a redline comparison, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to its renewal. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 6/9/25. (lccjn1)

MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Bracken, Mason)

Note: Mr. Bracken contacted the plaintiff, Mr. von Prince, by email to ask if he would agree to an extension, which he naturally agreed to. It is now up to the judge to decide.

Answer from Mr. von Prince

Mr. Assistant United States Attorney Mason D. Bracken

Civil Division, U.S. Attorney’s Office

Thank you for your message. Of course, I agree to your request for an extension of time.

The primary concern is that the United States government, especially President Donald Trump, be informed of the current legal situation. Apparently, President Donald Trump is unaware that the Two -plus-Four Treaty of 1990 has not been implemented and has been definitively terminated by the German side. The Potsdam Agreement of 1945 is still in force, as the US also pointed out on September 27/28, 1990. This means that action may only be taken within the framework of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany and reparations are still to be paid.

Only now has it been officially determined that freedom of expression is restricted.

The truth is that, with the German state of Bavaria leading the way, a Nazi dictatorship is back in power. All legal provisions are now just words on paper. In reality, they're being broken as much as possible. Together with Ms. Karin Leffer and others, we founded the Bund für das Recht (“Association for the Law”) in 2006. We published the book “Do Your Duty – Save Your Existence” with regard to the Potsdam Agreement. We demanded the independence of judges, Article 97 of the Basic Law – this has been completely eliminated. We demanded that cases coming before the court be assigned to judges at random, Article 101 of the Basic Law. we demanded that court minutes be kept verbatim, Article 103 of the Basic Law, that judgments be signed by the judge, in accordance with the legal provisions.

Ms. Karin Leffer is therefore wanted on an arrest warrant and has been living in exile for over 11 years with the risk of being arrested at any time, etc.

The sovereignty of Switzerland and Belgium was violated, etc.

President Putin of the Russian Federation knows this. He says that he feels threatened by the Nazis under the protection of the EU and NATO, but does not give any details so as not to interfere in NATO's internal affairs.

What is important now is not a quick judgment, but that President Donald Trump and the US Department of Justice are informed that, for example, no arrest warrants from the Federal Republic of Germany may be enforced.

With the utmost respect

Beowulf von Prince

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, Amending Defendant United States of America's 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Bracken, Mason)

MINUTE ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the15 16 Motions for Extension of Time are GRANTED and that the government shall respond to the complaint on or before November 3, 2025. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 8/15/25. (lccjn1)