because of

Compensation for damages arising from the Allies' official order against the German Reich and violation of the general rules of international law, defined here in the Convention with respect to the laws and customs of war on land, with annex of regulations of 1907 (HLWC), which applies to all parties until the end of the World War.

These states are responsible for ensuring that the HLWC, Section Three - Occupation, is observed with regard to the Danzigers.

With the invasion of Danzig on September 1, 1939 at 4:45 a.m., the nationals of the nationalist German Reich were responsible for the violations of the HLWC.

Now it is again the nationals of the nationalist German Reich and subsequently the Swiss Confederation, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Kingdom of Belgium and Austria.

The alleged instigator is the founder and head of the Swiss foundation World Economic Forum (WEF) and founder of the Swiss foundation "Young Global Leaders", Mr. Klaus Schwab, a national of the nationalist German Reich. He himself publicly admits that the "Young Global Leaders" penetrate governments. This means that the governments are not forced to represent the interests of their state, their people, but the interests of the "Young Global Leaders".

A criminal complaint and criminal charges are brought on suspicion of criminal acts under Indictment Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of the Statutes of the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials....for more please read:

This is how the publicity of a trial is practiced and not like in the FRG, where minutes do not contain witness statements or access to files is denied.

On the website of the US State Department there is a pdf with a list of the bilateral and multilateral treaties of the USA that are in force.

We are publishing the link and the pdf here so that everyone can see for themselves that, for example, the Potsdam Agreement is still in force (see page 549 - Protocol of the proceedings of the Berlin conference) and not, as claimed on the German page of wikipedia, that it is no longer in force.

This is important because it is repeatedly claimed that Germany or the FRG is sovereign.

Even J.D. Vance, Donald Trump's candidate for Vice President in the upcoming election, refers to Germany as a “client” of the USA.

Plaintiff filed this civil action pro se on July 25, 2024, and the Clerk of Court issued summonses to Plaintiff on September 23, 2024. Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis and therefore is responsible for serving the Defendants with process, consisting of the summons and a copy of the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (c). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4: "If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court - on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice...or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (m). Here, more than 90 days have elapsed since Plaintiff filed his Complaint, yet the record does not reflect that service has occurred. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to show cause in writing by May 19, 2025 why this action should not be dismissed. If Plaintiff does not effectuate service or satisfactorily respond to this Minute Order by May 19, 2025, the Court may dismiss this case without further notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (m); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Civil Rule 83.23. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail this Minute Order to Plaintiff's address of record. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 4/18/25. (lccjn1)