Complaint in the District Court of Columbia, Washington D.C.

In the USA, all documents filed with the court and all deadlines are published as befits a public hearing.

This means that our documents can be viewed by everyone - once in court and once on a privately financed internet platform, the pacermonitor:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/31398655/LEFFER_et_al_v_FEDERAL_REPUBLIC_OF_GERMANY_et_al

The lawsuit filed in the District Court of Columbia, Washington D.C., Case Number 1:19-cv-03529-CJN, preceded the class-action. With this lawsuit we prove that there is no court in Europe that guarantees the requirements of the UN Human Rights, the EU Human Rights and the Basic Law for the FRG to have independent, legal and impartial judges.

The reason for this is that the 2+4 Treaty was never implemented - see Doc. No. 6.

This Treaty contains two conditions. One of them is that the FRG gives itself a constitution. Why and how no constitution was made and the consequences we have summarized in the complaint.
There are now several possibilities: Implementation of the 2+4 Treaty or peace treaty.

If the FRG takes the position that it does not have to comment on this complaint, others will decide. But then not only about a constitution, but also about compensation and reparations. The FRG then has no more say in the matter.
We have not only once submitted a constitution to the FRG. It had the chance to come to the negotiating table.
According to the 2+4 Treaty, the Allies would have waived reparations. Then Poland or Greece would not have had a claim either. Since this treaty was not fulfilled, the reparations are still outstanding.
Whoever joins the class-action will have a say. Anyone who thinks that unlawful, dependent and biased judges are enough for him and is therefore not interested in the class-action has no right to vote. Someone who waives his rights, who does not stand up for his rights, has no rights.